A majority of experts consider that cyclists should pass a test for road safety before giving permission to use public roads. Nevertheless, this essay wil explain why I strongly believe that allowing cyclists without a test is impractical and may lead to negative consequences. To begin with, one clear disadvantage of this development is that it is deteriorate for people’s future, they expose themselves to danger.
As a result, there are an exseccive number of accidents in life. It is not only dangerous for drivers but also pedestrians walking on the streets. For example, in Uzbekistan, government give any kind of permission even without qualifications. Consequently, country would experience a gradual growth in the number of people who have disease. Otherwise, If government has an strict regulation especially on road safety, people will not contract a illness. Furthermore, nowadays the number of people who are ill is developing day by day.
Nevertheless, If cyclists learn knowledge about roads, they will avoid many accidents and injuries. As a result, fewer people will fall ill or require medical treatment, which reduces healthcare costs. This situation is beneficial not only for individuals but also for the government, since it saves public money and resources. In conclusion, although, safety rules are vital for cyclists, it will give them long life-span.
For this reason I am inclined to consider that when cyclists learn rules of roads and take a test to pass, there will not be several accidents in the road.