One school of thought holds that the government needs to prioritize ongoing issues that are happening in the country rather than focusing on international matters. Personally, although I acknowledge that both opinions hold their own merits, I believe that striking a balance would be the best approach.
On the one hand, it is reasonable that some people think domestic matters should be prioritized by the government. This is because the major mission of the government is to ensure the best conditions to foster citizens’ lives and help them develop fully their potentials in both academic and employment fields using the financial resources originating from taxpayers. As a result, the authorities should invest in basic services such as healthcare, education and entertainment amenities, which significantly enhance people’s living standards and generate satisfaction that stimulate them to contribute to overall economic growth. Additionally, addressing national persistent concerns related to employment and politics can foster social cohesion. When the citizens feel economically secure and politically represented, they are more likely to trust the public institutions, which ensures social stability and long-term development. On the other hand, taking care of international problems also offers several different yet important advantages.
Firstly, there are transnational issues such as climate change, terrorism or pandemics, which cannot be tackled without international cooperation. Therefore, national authorities should contribute to global institutions to mitigate the dissemination of harmful influences in society. For instance, when Covid-19 broke out, many nations around the world joined hands to invent vaccines to curb the proliferation of the pandemic. Additionally, addressing environmental degradation, particularly global warming issues, requires collective efforts, as pollution in one country can substantially impact other nations. In this way, a collaboration among nations is indispensable, alleviating the detrimental effects that can undermine citizens’ physical and mental well-being. In conclusion, after considering both sides, I believe that putting in efforts in contributing to and addressing both domestic and international matters would be the best approach, as it can help provide citizens with much stable living experiences if controlled effectively.